One Common Agreement Between Gandhism And Marxism Is Class Struggle

  • Post Author:
  • Post Category:Uncategorized

47. Which of the following statements on the general difference between plant and animal cells are correct? (Response C) The man in dhoti and scarf, should not be one in his early days. Born on October 2, 1869, in a class of a wealthy Gujarati family in the princely state of Porbandar, Gandhi was fortunate enough to obtain his law degree from London. His father a Diwan at a local raja, certainly shows his noble ancestry. Nevertheless, this could not mean that Marx should not be attributed to what he really wanted to accomplish, because if elimination is not possible, the “restriction” (of class warfare and private property) is certainly. Gandhiji firmly believed that this could go a long way towards maintaining balance in the social order. Gandhiji, as a socialist with a difference, can therefore be firmly confirmed in this sense. Marxists have a deep faith in class struggle. Marx said there were two classes in each country from the beginning.

One class was by the exploiters and the other by the exploited. Although these classes have different names in different countries, they were always on the wood at each other`s heads. Today, capitalists are the exploiters and the exploited workers. 2. A common agreement between Gandhism and Marxism is (Response- A) This way of separating from the interest of the working class is even more evident, considering the Royal Indian naval mutiny of February 1946, that “about 20,000 sailors went on strike, many of whom raised the red flag. The Communist Party (CPI), backed by socialist leaders in congress, called for a national strike where 300,000 workers in the city of Bombay pulled tools out of solidarity.¬†This only alarmed the already threatened bourgeois Congress party and the Muslim League, which “worked hand in hand only a year before the bloody division to break this unity of community and class.” (Mistry) For Marx, the state is an instrument of oppression and an organ of the bourgeoisie that serves only to maintain class domination. That is why he aspires to class struggle and revolution, which will ultimately lead to a stateless society. If one observes closely his conception of libertarian socialism, he has, surprisingly, no welcome to the most basic needs of the suppression of private property. So much so that, according to Leo Trotsky, Gandhi was always looking for compromises while he hesitated between his bourgeois comrades and his fellow workers. As Trotsky made clear to Indian workers in 1939, this could only suggest that Gandhi probably practiced a socialism that was not at all inspired by the Soviet version of communism.

Because Gandhi avoided any chance that could trigger a class war when he felt that “class struggle has ruined the country and the production of goods has decreased considerably.